It was an okay little car. It looked a little too fancy for what the vehicle was offering though, so overall it was sort of weird. But I would be hard pressed to say the vehicle itself was weird, as it did do what it was supposed to do with little or no trouble so I cannot complain too much about what it was supposed to do. But overall it did work and did not have any hugely glaring flaws that could and would make me hate such a vehicle. It is not like it was or could be the worst of its kind, but that is also a con. It does not stand out enough.

When it was new, reviewers praised the RDX for its good handling and acceleration. They also liked that the RDX has loads of standard features, though some complained that cabin fit and finish seemed a bit subpar. The RDX has one available engine, a turbocharged four-cylinder that makes 240 horsepower. While most critics found this to be sufficient to move the RDX without trouble, some did notice hints of turbo lag. Front-wheel drive models, which were newly-available for 2010, earn fuel economy estimates of 19/24 mpg city/highway, while those with all-wheel drive achieve 17/22 mpg. These figures are about average for the class. The RDX’s maximum cargo capacity is fairly spacious at 60.6 cubic feet. Inside, the RDX mostly drew compliments for seat comfort and cabin space. Several critics, though, noted that some interior materials seemed cheap. However, many liked the standard features, which include leather seats, a power sunroof, backup camera, dual-zone climate control, Bluetooth and satellite radio. A technology package adds features like an upgraded sound system, navigation and a climate control system that automatically adjusts the cabin temperature depending on the intensity of the sun. The RDX received a facelift for 2010, but otherwise has changed very little since 2007, so you might be able to save some money by shopping for an older model, so long as you know that front-wheel drive is unavailable.