Location & Radius
Make, Model, & Trim
Year Range

to

Price Range

to


Max Mileage

0 mi.

Doors
Body Types
Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Cylinders

exterior
interior
Cabin Type
Rear Wheel
Bed Type

3 Suzuki Reno results

Suzuki Reno OWNER RATINGS & REVIEWS

Owner Reviews
3.5
14 Reviews
5 star
14%
4 star
50%
3 star
7%
2 star
29%
1 star
0%
Overall
3.5
Value
3.6
Style
3.7
Performance
3.5
Comfort
3.8
Fuel Economy
3.9
Reliability
3.6
Write a review
Rochester, New York
2.0
null
The Suzuki Reno is certainly a quirky looking car. Overall it has good acceleration when the car is running well. However, it runs fairly loudly and even with new suspension the ride is a bit rough. The quality has been abysmal. It seems like the car is always requiring new work. The suspension went bad, new radiator, new brakes, now the gauges are failing. To add a cherry on top, there are not aftermarket body parts available for the car. The hood was dented from an accident needed to be replaced. My only option was salvage yard or a new hood from the manufacturer.
MFox
MFox
Weaverville, North Carolina
4.0
Dependable and roomy
I bought the Suzuki in 2011. Not a single day has passed where the engine didn't crank up, no matter how cold the weather. I am also impressed with how well it does in the snow, considering its size. I have an older car, a 1994 Prizm that is bigger, yet cannot get up a steep hill in the snow. I also think that for a small car, it has an amazing amount of room. My husband and I were actually able to fit a normal sized DRYER in the back when we moved.
Charleston, South Carolina
4.0
Peacock Vaughan.
I like reason clearly the Suzuki Reno has excellent value as a used car. still, excellent value doesn't exactly mean comfort or power. While the ex trim level was loaded and included features like leather seats, remote keyless entry and cruise control, the Reno in any trim offered barely adequate performance.