Location & Radius
Make, Model, & Trim
Year Range

to

Price Range

to


Max Mileage

0 mi.

Doors
Body Types
Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Cylinders

exterior
interior
Cabin Type
Rear Wheel
Bed Type

110 Mercedes-Benz C-Class results

2009 Mercedes-Benz C-Class OWNER RATINGS & REVIEWS

Owner Reviews
2.0
1 Reviews
5 star
0%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
100%
1 star
0%
Overall
2.0
Value
2.0
Style
4.0
Performance
1.0
Comfort
0.0
Fuel Economy
2.0
Reliability
1.0
Write a review
GG
GG
Glendale, California
2.0
Overpriced Junk
Honestly for a brand with a name so reputable and well known, I expected much more from this car. Drove it around 2009 so it has been quite a few years but what I do remember is mostly negative. It was a beautiful car from the exterior, and the interior was alright, but that is where all the pros ended. The car felt slower than my four cylinder today even with the engine inside of it, probably because of the heavy full metal finish. It was an incredibly expensive lease even with the cheapest trim I picked, and the dealerships were very hard to find and very difficult for me to get to due to he distance away from my home. This leads me to my biggest issue, the car had an incredible amount of maintenance involved and it felt like I was driving out 20 miles every month for something that stopped working or broke down. One month it was the wipers, another month the brakes had worn down prematurely. A car this expensive should never have issues like that for quite a few years given that it was a brand new, never before driven lease vehicle.