Location & Radius
Make, Model, & Trim
Year Range

to

Price Range

to


Max Mileage

0 mi.

Doors
Body Types
Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Cylinders

exterior
interior
Cabin Type
Rear Wheel
Bed Type

138 Chevrolet Monte Carlo results

automobile-icon

Need help finding the right vehicle?

Chevrolet Monte Carlo OWNER RATINGS & REVIEWS

Owner Reviews
4.0
44 Reviews
5 star
30%
4 star
45%
3 star
20%
2 star
5%
1 star
0%
Overall
4.0
Value
4.1
Style
4.3
Performance
4.3
Comfort
4.4
Fuel Economy
3.4
Reliability
4.1
Write a review
mf
mf
Antigo, Wisconsin
4.0
Good but some poor design
The car is beautiful. It was purchased brand new in 2002. The styling is what ultimately made me buy it. I had a used 2000 previously but it had problems with electrical. The performance was fine but gas mileage wasn't the best, although it has improved with age. There have been a few issues that required service but most were during warranty period. I don't like the design of where the rust begins at the wheel wells. I also don't like the way the snow and ice fall into the trunk when opened. There seems to be some paint issues on the drivers door which I have seen on other Monte's of similar years. A common problem that I have also noticed is the wheel bearings require replacement often. The traction control system also has some issues at times where the lights will go on for no apparent reason. The CD player didn't last very long, I think it worked property for maybe the first 5 years or so.
MC
MC
Spencerport, New York
4.0
Good Starter Car
The seats remain in high quality condition after all this time, as well as the functioning of the radio. One of the seat warmers has broken. Some of the buttons have been worn away so they are becoming more difficult to read. The car remains safe to drive, which is great because I have driven over 120,000 miles. I have owned it for three years and it drove smoothly until a month ago when I discovered I had to replace the tires and power-steering fluids. The gas mileage is average, not expensive. The car rides low and it is built very long. Also, it doesn't turn on a dime so I often do a 3 or 4 point turn in order to park. I enjoy the large trunk space because I am often traveling with tools and supplies. The car is relatively reliable, which is why it has lasted the last three years. This was my first car so it was able to safely transport me from one place to another. However, I had to completely replace the exhaust system within the first year. The air conditioning stopped working in the first year also. I bought the car at 90,000 miles.
Shanor-Northvue, Pennsylvania
3.0
Good and solid.
I think that over all this car is a really good car as long as you keep up with it. I bought this car last April and immediately took it to the shop to get worked on. There were some things wrong with it that typically go wrong with older cars but over all it wasn't bad. I do have some problems with it shifting, which, from what I read on another review site I think that's a common issue but I was able to get it fixed before it got too out of hand. The interior is great just a little boring feature wise but I think that it is a good and solid car for pretty much anyone. I do like the moonroof but I've had some recent issues with it sticking and not wanting to stay on the track which ill have to get figured out. I don't really like the length though because it is a really long car and I think that because of that I have a harder time parking it too.